Love Is Not An Oxymoron


The term love is often used as an oxymoron, but it has a biological and evolutionary basis. Scientists have found that our bodies have an evolved mechanism for identifying and appreciating loved ones. In fact, love is one of our most basic emotions, as its biological and evolutionary basis is rooted in our species’ evolutionary history. Neurophysiological studies of romantic love show that it activates reward brain regions. In addition, love is a deeply emotional emotion, with feelings of intense attachment to a partner influenced by a sense of duty or selflessness.

While we are all attracted to our partners when we are in love, there is a difference between lust and love. When we are in love, we may want to spend more time with our partner. We may move in together, start a family, and lift each other as we develop our careers. Our feelings for our partner are influenced by our hormones, and our decisions may seem to contradict our rational thinking. Hence, we should not be surprised if we are drawn to love-making more than our own.

The four major types of theories of love are: emotional, relational, phenomenological, and cognitive. Although each type of theory includes some ideas that are central to the others, there is overlap and sometimes overstretching. Moreover, many accounts of love are quasi-reductionist in nature, understanding it in terms of notions such as attachment, affection, and evaluation. But these accounts are not always able to explain the “depth” of love intuitively.

According to the Sternberg classification, love is a complex emotion. It can be defined as a combination of emotions, which include warmth, protectiveness, and trust. Love can apply to non-human animals, principles, or even religious beliefs. It has been a topic of philosophical debate for centuries. Despite the many interpretations of the term, most people agree on the general concept. The exact meaning of love is unclear, but many people agree that it implies strong feelings of affection.

The bestowal view, on the other hand, has a kernel of truth. While love is a creative reaction to antecedent value, it is also a response to its own value. Consequently, love accounts that view evaluation in terms of appraisal miss a key feature of the phenomenon. And so, it is essential to recognize the uniqueness of the human experience when it comes to love. It is an important aspect of our identity as image-bearers.

The Ancient Greeks tried to define the nature of love. They divided it into four categories: storge, phila, and eros. Those distinctions still exist today, but modern philosophers have tended to blur them. In any case, it’s still worth considering whether you’re in love with your lover. And what about love itself? There are so many kinds of love, so it’s hard to tell which is which.